Page 39 of 189

Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2014 4:30 pm
by Waitress
DC69Wildcat wrote: Image
She got what she asked for.

Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2014 6:14 pm
by 71cat
After reading the UNCC board earlier in the day, I can't tell you how relieved I was to see that the "she" you're referring to is the woman who ordered a cake.

Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2014 7:45 pm
by Waitress
71cat, I am all for disambiguation.

Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2014 9:26 pm
by 71cat
My family has proudly stood for Disambiguation for more than 300 years

Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2014 10:58 pm
by WildCock
citycat wrote:The way FSU has handled Jameis's issues is the opposite of stupid. They know how to placate and entertain disinterested students who have to loiter on campus for three years before heading off to the NFL.
Not trying to be a grammar nazi here, but the disinterested/uninterested distinction is rapidly fading. Those interested in the preservation of distinctions in meaning within the English language (most Davidson people, I would hope) should be vigilant in correct usage.

Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2014 6:15 am
by mccabemi
Literally no one cares about word usage anymore.

http://www.cnn.com/2013/08/15/living/li ... index.html

Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2014 10:10 am
by stevelee
mccabemi wrote:Literally no one cares about word usage anymore.

http://www.cnn.com/2013/08/15/living/li ... index.html
An enormity of people literally could care less.

And they are not very far from wrong.

Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2014 11:15 am
by Waitress
WildCock wrote:
citycat wrote:The way FSU has handled Jameis's issues is the opposite of stupid. They know how to placate and entertain disinterested students who have to loiter on campus for three years before heading off to the NFL.
Not trying to be a grammar nazi here, but the disinterested/uninterested distinction is rapidly fading. Those interested in the preservation of distinctions in meaning within the English language (most Davidson people, I would hope) should be vigilant in correct usage.
I like the the word disinterested, but it's harder and harder to find people who have nothing to gain by their decisions. Maybe raptorcat?

See http://books.google.com/books?id=mVcJqKs1isUC&lpg=PA266&dq=garner%20disinterested&pg=PA265#v=onepage&q=garner%20disinterested&f=false

See also
Disinterested and uninterested have a tangled history. Uninterested originally meant impartial, but this sense fell into disuse during the 18th century. About the same time the original sense of disinterested also disappeared, with uninteresteduninterested is still out of use, but the original sense of disinterested revived in the early 20th century. The revival has since been under frequent attack as an illiteracy and a blurring or loss of a useful distinction. Actual usage shows otherwise. Sense 2 of disinterested is still its most frequent sense, especially in edited prose; it shows no sign of vanishing. A careful writer may choose sense 1a of disinterested in preference to uninterested for emphasis <teaching the letters of the alphabet to her wiggling and supremely disinteresteddisinterested has developed a sense (1b), perhaps influenced by sense 1 of the prefix dis-, that contrasts with uninterested <when I grow tired or disinterested
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/disinterested

Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2014 11:47 am
by stevelee
It's like the difference between ignorance and apathy.

From the egg's mouth:

Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2014 2:29 pm
by WildCock
Waitress wrote:
WildCock wrote:
citycat wrote:The way FSU has handled Jameis's issues is the opposite of stupid. They know how to placate and entertain disinterested students who have to loiter on campus for three years before heading off to the NFL.
Not trying to be a grammar nazi here, but the disinterested/uninterested distinction is rapidly fading. Those interested in the preservation of distinctions in meaning within the English language (most Davidson people, I would hope) should be vigilant in correct usage.
I like the the word disinterested, but it's harder and harder to find people who have nothing to gain by their decisions. Maybe raptorcat?

See http://books.google.com/books?id=mVcJqKs1isUC&lpg=PA266&dq=garner%20disinterested&pg=PA265#v=onepage&q=garner%20disinterested&f=false

See also
Disinterested and uninterested have a tangled history. Uninterested originally meant impartial, but this sense fell into disuse during the 18th century. About the same time the original sense of disinterested also disappeared, with uninteresteduninterested is still out of use, but the original sense of disinterested revived in the early 20th century. The revival has since been under frequent attack as an illiteracy and a blurring or loss of a useful distinction. Actual usage shows otherwise. Sense 2 of disinterested is still its most frequent sense, especially in edited prose; it shows no sign of vanishing. A careful writer may choose sense 1a of disinterested in preference to uninterested for emphasis <teaching the letters of the alphabet to her wiggling and supremely disinteresteddisinterested has developed a sense (1b), perhaps influenced by sense 1 of the prefix dis-, that contrasts with uninterested <when I grow tired or disinterested
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/disinterested

Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2014 3:26 pm
by raptorcat
Waitress wrote:I like the the word disinterested, but it's harder and harder to find people who have nothing to gain by their decisions. Maybe raptorcat?
When I make decisions indicative of my fondness for malt beverages and desserts, I do indeed gain.

Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2014 8:28 pm
by citycat
The sort of football players I was talking about, who hang around three years without doing more than dipping a toe into academia, are both uninterested and disinterested.

If they were not disinterested, they would try to stop others from studying or disrupt classes. They are neutral about the academics and the efforts of the students on their campus.

Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2014 9:25 pm
by stevelee
raptorcat wrote:
Waitress wrote:I like the the word disinterested, but it's harder and harder to find people who have nothing to gain by their decisions. Maybe raptorcat?
When I make decisions indicative of my fondness for malt beverages and desserts, I do indeed gain.
During my high school class reunion weekend, one of the people I hung out with a lot is a woman who uses an ultra-low-carb diet to control her diabetes without medication. In that regimen as she understands it, the only alcoholic beverage she can drink is Scotch. At what amounted to after-parties, every time someone offered her some wine, she'd have more Scotch. With her A1c level testing about 5.0, I'm not going to knock it. (While we were discussing the low-carb lifestyle, I was eating peanut M&Ms and drinking white wine.)

Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2014 9:19 am
by loosha's lad
stevelee wrote:
mccabemi wrote:Literally no one cares about word usage anymore.

http://www.cnn.com/2013/08/15/living/li ... index.html
An enormity of people literally could care less.

And they are not very far from wrong.
Steve, this one is for you:
http://www.theguardian.com/books/booksb ... in-browser

Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2014 9:43 am
by wildforthecats
Peanut M&M's with a wine chaser...new Brickhouse pregame menu item?