Page 60 of 189

Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2015 9:59 pm
by Wildcat92
Speedy is right.

Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2015 10:36 pm
by stan
:roll:

If I wrote "got a Clinton", the possible references are many -- got a bribe, got caught lying, got caught obstructing justice, got away with a crime, got preferential treatment, got caught with underage prostitutes, got caught for sexual harassment, sexual assault, or rape ....

But a "Lewinsky" does not have any possible other meanings. She specifically told her friends she was going to DC to earn herself some kneepads and she did. She has nothing to complain about because she turned herself into a public joke. Just as Clinton has no reason to complain that history will remember him as the prez whose need for phone sex trumped national security.

I was actually trying to use an expression that was less objectionable than "blowjob". But I suspect that the panty-bunchers would squeal no matter what.

Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2015 12:14 am
by Wildcat92
stan wrote::roll:

If I wrote "got a Clinton", the possible references are many -- got a bribe, got caught lying, got caught obstructing justice, got away with a crime, got preferential treatment, got caught with underage prostitutes, got caught for sexual harassment, sexual assault, or rape ....

But a "Lewinsky" does not have any possible other meanings. She specifically told her friends she was going to DC to earn herself some kneepads and she did. She has nothing to complain about because she turned herself into a public joke. Just as Clinton has no reason to complain that history will remember him as the prez whose need for phone sex trumped national security.

I was actually trying to use an expression that was less objectionable than "blowjob". But I suspect that the panty-bunchers would squeal no matter what.
I can't imagine why anyone would think you have a misogyny problem. Totally mystifying.

Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2015 8:30 am
by BDF
Surely we are getting close to reaching our limit.

Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2015 9:07 am
by i77cat
Yep, pretty close.

Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2015 9:32 am
by i77cat
http://espn.go.com/college-football/sto ... ademically


"I think we recognized that all of my football players are at-risk -- all of them -- really," Kelly told Notre Dame Insider. "Honestly, I don't know that any of our players would get into the school by themselves right now with the academic standards the way they are. Maybe one or two of our players that are on scholarship."

No, no, no, Coach Kelley. Don't admit that only one or two of your players could get into school without football. Most of us know that Notre Dame makes huge concessions for sports, but you can't say it out loud.

Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2015 9:39 am
by stevelee
UNC article below it, when I read it.

Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2015 10:02 am
by jamesdhogan
i77cat wrote:No, no, no, Coach Kelley. Don't admit that only one or two of your players could get into school without football. Most of us know that Notre Dame makes huge concessions for sports, but you can't say it out loud.
Confession, my Catholic upbringing taught me, is good for the soul.

Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2015 10:39 am
by MadelastCut
PC police have correctly ascertained that saying the phrase "you guys" is sexist. Whoa nelly (not Delly); fortunately, we jersey boys always go with: "you'se guys", which is more gender respectful.

Also declared by PC cops to be banned is calling America "the Land of Opportunity", which of course, under our European welfare state, is entirely accurate.

Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2015 11:48 am
by Ursa Midmajor
I prefer Tom Wolfe's I am Charlotte Simmons terminology, but then I do live in one of those Atlanta houses with lawns like breasts (from A Man in Full)

Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2015 4:04 pm
by i77cat

Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2015 6:03 pm
by citycat
Maybe he was picking up some wedding presents for Brittney Griner.

Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2015 7:56 pm
by collegecoach8502
citycat wrote:Maybe he was picking up some wedding presents for Brittney Griner.
He would have been taking them back. They are getting divorced.

Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 1:32 am
by TOK
collegecoach8502 wrote:
citycat wrote:Maybe he was picking up some wedding presents for Brittney Griner.
He would have been taking them back. They are getting divorced.
I was hoping they could work things out after the mutual assault charges, WBA suspensions and community service. I guess true love doesn't conquer all every time. :lol:

Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 7:49 am
by seamac77
TOK wrote:
collegecoach8502 wrote:
citycat wrote:Maybe he was picking up some wedding presents for Brittney Griner.
He would have been taking them back. They are getting divorced.
I was hoping they could work things out after the mutual assault charges, WBA suspensions and community service. I guess true love doesn't conquer all every time. :lol:


http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/14/fashi ... .html?_r=0

"While the marriage of Ms. Griner and Ms. Johnson, who said she is not a lesbian, was greeted with skepticism by some, it was largely celebrated by fans, who welcomed the early baby news."